The Behaviorist Bookclub1 CEU (Learning)60 minOn-demand

Child Development Deep Dive: Middle Childhood (6-8 year olds)

Presented by Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Child Development Deep Dive: Middle Childhood (6-8 year olds)
FreeDetailed certificate included

In this second installment of her three-part child development series for behavior analysts, Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA (Problem Zolved, LLC) covers middle childhood, ages 6-8. She reviews why these years matter — school readiness, expanding social repertoires, emerging metacognition, and a heightened period of hippocampal activity that supports recall — and stresses considering the whole child across physical, emotional, social, and cognitive domains, repeatedly noting that developmental delay does not mean lower IQ. She surveys common problem behaviors at this age (whining, tantrums, task refusal), prescribing communication skills and tolerance building, and flags when to refer out (SLPs, feeding specialists, developmental pediatricians) and mandated reporting duties. On assessment and programming, she advocates using caregiver motivation to drive intervention, including Likert-scale interviews built on AFLS domains, and asking children directly what they want to work on. She cautions against scripted responding and limiting reinforcement to expected answers, arguing that operant conditioning can turn learners into 'little robots' if analysts punish independence and creativity. Practical strategies include tact-to-intraverbal bridge programming and explicit-memory recall games, honoring mands for removal without coercion, scaffolding through choices and ongoing pairing, handling homework requests appropriately (analysts should not do academics but can build sitting and attending repertoires), goal-writing critiques, session materials tips, and caregiver pairing guidance, including not letting parent non-response punish the analyst's outreach efforts.

Free · no card. You'll create your password after the quiz, when you claim your certificate. By continuing you agree to OpenCEU's Terms and Privacy Policy.

Already have an account? Sign in

Cancel any time. Cert delivered to your inbox the moment you pass the quiz.

Learner ratings

4.6

from 81 learners

97% would recommend this CEU to other professionals in their field (33 responses)

  • “very good”

    — Ana S.
  • “I think the presentation presented the IV programming loud and clear. As a reminder, this refers to the precise design, delivery, and manipulation of Independent Variables (IVs). This type of variable always affects the Dependent Variable (DV), which is the client's target behavior.”

    — Cristina G.
  • “I loved the real life, applicable examples. Speaker had great knowledge of developmental milestones”

    — Jocelyn C.

About this CEU

In this second installment of her three-part child development series for behavior analysts, Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA (Problem Zolved, LLC) covers middle childhood, ages 6-8. She reviews why these years matter — school readiness, expanding social repertoires, emerging metacognition, and a heightened period of hippocampal activity that supports recall — and stresses considering the whole child across physical, emotional, social, and cognitive domains, repeatedly noting that developmental delay does not mean lower IQ. She surveys common problem behaviors at this age (whining, tantrums, task refusal), prescribing communication skills and tolerance building, and flags when to refer out (SLPs, feeding specialists, developmental pediatricians) and mandated reporting duties. On assessment and programming, she advocates using caregiver motivation to drive intervention, including Likert-scale interviews built on AFLS domains, and asking children directly what they want to work on. She cautions against scripted responding and limiting reinforcement to expected answers, arguing that operant conditioning can turn learners into 'little robots' if analysts punish independence and creativity. Practical strategies include tact-to-intraverbal bridge programming and explicit-memory recall games, honoring mands for removal without coercion, scaffolding through choices and ongoing pairing, handling homework requests appropriately (analysts should not do academics but can build sitting and attending repertoires), goal-writing critiques, session materials tips, and caregiver pairing guidance, including not letting parent non-response punish the analyst's outreach efforts.

From the talk

What was covered

Kelly Brzak on ages 6 to 8: milestones, problem behavior, caregiver motivation, recall games, and how not to build little robots.

  • Ask caregivers to rate how motivated they are for each skill, not just whether the child can already do it.
  • Refer out for speech, feeding, and severe delays, then support that provider's plan inside your own sessions.
  • Stop limiting reinforcement to the answer you expected, because a creative response is worth more than a clean script.
  • Run tact to intraverbal recall trials with growing delays while this age group's memory system is most active.
  • Decline homework help and say so up front, then build sitting and attending repertoires instead.
  • Honor a child's first independent request for a break, set a timer, and shape the request from there.

Why ages six to eight matter for behavior analysts

Middle childhood arrives with a long list of to-dos. Kids need school readiness. Their social repertoires grow fast. Their minds get busy and curious. Kelly Brzak called this the stretch where children crave independence. They also start to notice their own thinking. That skill is metacognition (thinking about your own thinking). They begin to work out where they fit inside a group.

Brzak opened with a quote about this shift. The move from early to middle childhood changes thinking, motivation, and social behavior. It shapes personality in wide ways. She came back to personality all hour. Her ask was simple. Treat the whole child, not just the goal sheet. That means physical, emotional, social, and cognitive growth at the same time.

She paired that with a warning for our field. Many six to eight year old clients have developmental delays. That fact does not tell you what a child understands. Brzak repeated the point on purpose. Kids this age can be small in size and still very sharp. Plan for the mind in front of you, not the age on the chart. Early experiences follow a child for life. She framed the work as a serious responsibility.

Developmentally delayed does not mean lower IQ.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Milestones across the whole child at six to eight

Six to eight year olds need to burn energy. Many schools still lean on sit down and be quiet. So a child may reach your session already worn out. Brzak pushed for less tablet time and more movement. Raise that with families with care, not judgment. You are advocating, not grading their parenting.

Food belongs in the picture too. Exposure to a range of foods matters at this age. With a picky eater, bring varied snacks. Let the child watch you eat them. Touching the snack can count as a win.

Socially, speaker and responder behavior (talking and listening skills) gets stronger. Children move from playing beside peers to playing with them. Imitation repertoires are ripe for teaching. Social skills carry more weight each year.

Emotionally, these kids still need a lot of adult attention. A child who acts out may be short on it. Appropriate touch and close proximity still matter. You may still see leftovers from the preschool years. Some children favor one adult. Some get clingy. Separation anxiety can look like crying or tantrums. Encourage growth without shame. Brzak warned against lines like big boys do not do that.

We want to give kids this age the chance to be independently successful.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Mandated reporting and knowing when to refer out

Brzak paused the content for a reminder. You are a mandated reporter (required by law to report abuse). If a child tells you something that is not okay, call. Do not weigh the evidence first. Do not ask the child if the story is pretend. Do not soften it or wave it off. She noted that believing children and getting them support can lower long term trauma symptoms. The call is uncomfortable. Make it anyway.

She also mapped out when to send a family elsewhere. A child who is not talking needs an SLP (a speech and language therapist). A child who is inconsolable may be sick, so point to the doctor. A child who is non responsive gets a 911 call.

Feeding is the referral she flagged hardest. Analysts sometimes take on limited diets alone. Feeding specialists exist for this. Stay in your scope and refer. If parents report severe delays, ask whether they have seen a developmental pediatrician (a doctor who evaluates child development).

Referring out does not end your role. You can support the other provider's plan inside your sessions. You can also seek training so the skill grows into your scope later.

It is not our job to decide whether or not there is abuse or neglect going on, but it is our job to report it to the professionals who are in charge of deciding whether or not it is going on.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Common problem behavior in middle childhood and what to teach instead

Brzak taught second and third grade for years before certification. Her list of common behavior at this age was blunt. Kids whine, yell, and cry. They throw tantrums and throw items. They stomp and slam doors. Task refusal shows up often. None of that is rare. All of it is workable.

Her prescription stays the same across the list. Teach communication. Build tolerance. Teach accepting an alternative. She files all of it under communication skills.

Emotional regulation is the messier piece. Insurance companies often dislike the term. Some analysts think the skill sits outside our work. Others ask who else will teach it. Brzak left that debate open for the room. She did add one concrete tip. If you teach emotions, use something other than emojis. Faces on a screen may not generalize (carry over to real life).

She also pushed back on a common goal. Zero instances of problem behavior across six months is not a fair target. A child this age will cry sometimes. A child this age will melt down sometimes. That is how a seven year old regulates and expresses. A goal should not ask a kid to stop being a kid.

Our prescription is always going to be increased communication skills and also building tolerance and accepting alternatives, things like that.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Let caregiver and child motivation drive the treatment plan

What is driving your intervention? Brzak asked the room to answer honestly. It should not be checking boxes on the VB-MAPP (a common language skills checklist). It should not be running down the AFLS (a daily living skills assessment) either. AFLS covers home skills, basic living, community participation, independence, and vocational skills. Those domains are useful. They are not a plan by themselves. She also asked whether age alone should pick your tool.

Her fix is to put numbers on caregiver motivation. Use a Likert scale (a simple low to high rating). Ask if the child washes dishes alone. Then ask how motivated the parent is about that skill. Build a short inventory from there. List each task. Mark whether the child is independent. If not, estimate the percent. Ask how big a priority it is to the family, not to you. Add a box for parents who want more detail. A checked box shows you where to start.

She runs the same interview across the AFLS domains. One question does a lot of work. What percent are you responsible for making this skill happen? Parents often believe a child is independent. The number shows they prompt more than they thought. If a parent wants to prompt less, you have your opening.

Ask the child too. Offer real choices, not a fake pick between two demands. If a child says no, try I wonder why, then wait. An I don't know may be honest, or it may be escape (a way out of a task). Probe it without pushing. If a child cannot answer yet, build the skill that makes an answer possible later.

If you can tap into the parent motivation, you're going to save yourself a lot of effort, and you're going to increase your effectiveness in skill generalization.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Scripts, coercion, and the little robot problem

Brzak ran an ethics check with the room, then landed on scripts. Should a learner answer only the way you expect? She told a story from about seven years ago. She searched for intraverbal programming (answering with nothing to look at) on YouTube. The top video showed a clean error correction. The prompt was bird flies in the. The child said tree. The adult corrected it to sky and ran a warm, skilled teaching loop.

Her question stuck with the room. Birds do fly into trees. What story did that child have ready? The correction erased it. Reinforcing only the expected answer does that every session.

She tied this to power, not sloppiness. Operant conditioning (learning shaped by what follows) works very well. That is exactly the risk. Do not punish independence and creativity by accident. Tell technicians to treat sessions like improv. Be ready to field whatever the child brings. The point of intraverbal work is dialogue about ideas, not filling in animal sounds.

The same rule covers no. Programming should be free of coercion and its tactics. Honor mands (requests) for removal, delay, or an alternative. If a child says leave me alone, and that is a first independent request, honor it. Set a timer and shape the request. Do not disappear for 45 minutes. If a child will not take part, scaffold differently. More choices. More pairing. More leisure skill building. Change the room. Bring in family, peers, and neighbors.

Operant conditioning is powerful enough that we can turn our learners into little robots if we are not super careful.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Tact to intraverbal bridges and recall games for six to eight year olds

This age is a strong window for memory work. The hippocampus (the brain area behind recall) is more active now than in infancy. Brzak said to use that fact. Build short term recall and lay the base for long term memory.

School shows the same shift. Math moves toward time and money. Both are more abstract than counting objects. Reading comprehension asks about things no longer in view. Children are moving from concrete to abstract.

Her main tool is tact to intraverbal bridging. A tact (naming something you can see) starts it. She learned the method from Dr. Partington. Hold up a toy. Let the child name it. Put it away. Ask what was in my hand. Then stretch the delay. Ten seconds. One minute. Five minutes. Tomorrow. Reinforce the long recalls heavily. If a child cannot recall, flash the item as a prompt, then hide it again.

The variations are easy to run. Put a car in a box and set a timer. Ask what is inside when it rings. Do it with the fridge if the parents are fine with that. Do it with the toy box or the child's room. You are targeting explicit memory (conscious, on purpose recall). Keep the trials varied instead of running one hoop 60 times.

These are ways to help the children build and flex those recall muscles.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Homework requests, session materials, and caregiver pairing

Parents ask for homework help often. Brzak's answer is no. School owns the academics. Depending on the insurance provider, homework help can double dip the system. Tell caregivers that up front.

There is still real work here. You can raise the value of sitting and attending to a task. Use sitting goals in moderation. Kids can stand and attend too. Play school instead. Children this age love being the teacher. Pair the child with school supplies. Post-its work well for labeling and matching.

Materials deserve planning. Bring sanitizer, writing tools, and fun things. Ziplocs keep the pieces together. Become an expert on the toys you carry. Check piece size, since kids this age may still mouth items. Dollar store toys often fall apart. In person analysts can keep a rotating library in the trunk. Do not skip a material because it looks too young. If the child can finish it alone, that is the whole point.

Caregivers need pairing too. Show them rather than only telling them. Get them into the action with you. Ask how they are and mean it. The subjective units of distress scale (a quick self rating of stress) helps you quantify parent stress. When a parent goes quiet, do not take it personally. Keep reaching out, because those home hours are where skills generalize.

Again, let's intentionally not let the parent's response or lack of response punish our effort.

From the talk — Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA

Common questions

Can a BCBA help a client with homework?▾

Brzak's answer is no. Academics belong to the school, and depending on the insurance provider, homework help can double dip the system. You can still raise the value of sitting and attending to a task, and you can pair the child with school supplies. Tell caregivers up front that homework is outside your role.

What assessment should I use with a six to eight year old?▾

Do not pick a tool by age alone. AFLS domains fit many learners this age, covering home skills, basic living, community participation, independence, and vocational skills. Brzak's bigger point is that checking boxes is not a plan. Layer a caregiver motivation rating on top so the plan reflects what the family actually wants.

How do I use caregiver motivation to write better goals?▾

Ask two questions per skill instead of one. First, can the child do it alone, and if not, at what percent? Second, how motivated is the family for that skill, on a simple low to high rating. Add a question about what percent of the skill the parent is responsible for, which often reveals more prompting than parents realize.

Should I ask a child what they want to work on?▾

Yes, and offer genuine choices rather than a fake pick between two demands. If the child says no, follow with I wonder why and use a time delay. An I don't know may be accurate or may be a way out of the task, so probe it gently. If the child cannot answer yet, teach the skills that will let them answer later.

What memory skills should I target at ages six to eight?▾

Target explicit memory, which is conscious recall of information. Brzak uses tact to intraverbal bridging. Name an item, hide it, then ask about it later. Stretch the delay from seconds to minutes to a full day. Box and timer games, fridge games, and toy box games all work. Reinforce the longer recalls heavily.

What should I do if a child discloses abuse during a session?▾

Make the report. You are a mandated reporter, and it is not your job to decide whether abuse or neglect happened. Do not minimize the disclosure or ask the child whether the story is pretend. Believing children and getting them support can reduce long term trauma symptoms.

About the speaker

Kelly Brzak, MS, BCBA holds a master's degree in child development and was certified in 2018. She founded a consultation and training company, and she taught second and third grade before entering behavior analysis. This session was part two of her three part child development series for behavior analysts. It covered middle childhood, ages six to eight.

This summary was generated from the recording’s transcript. Quotes are taken word for word from the talk.

What you'll learn

  1. 1Learning Objectives
  2. 2Participants will identify key developmental milestones for children ages 6–8 across social, emotional, language, cognitive, and motor domains.
  3. 3Participants will recognize common problem behaviors observed during middle childhood and discuss developmental and environmental factors that may contribute to these behaviors.
  4. 4Participants will describe evidence based programming strategies for children ages 6–8, including practical approaches to caregiver pairing and the use of Behavioral Skills Training (BST).

Concepts in this CEU

Related talks

Talks that cover the same concepts

More from The Behaviorist Bookclub

OpenCEU is supported by advertising from third-party sponsors. Sponsors are clearly labeled, have no influence over course content, instructors, or CEU decisions, and never appear on certificates. The BACB does not sponsor, approve, or endorse OpenCEU sponsors or their products.